Now the first question that might come in your mind is what are circuit limits? Well these are safeguards for investors which are mainly kept to regulate the movement of share price. Suppose in a day, the share price comes to its limit, then that particular stock is halted. This is the basic concept behind circuit limits.
Circuit limits are set or regulated by the exchanges in order to prevent investors from sudden price changes. Circuit limits are the primary reason why there is stability in the stock market. But the question here is why did this happen to Paytm. Let’s find out more about the same.
Table of contents
- What actually happened?
- What was the impact of this change?
- What was the official statement?
- But did Paytm get through this…
- What could be the possible reasons behind this step?
What actually happened?
There was a steep price crash after RBI’s regulatory measures. And that’s not it! Both BSE and NSE decided to alter their circuit limits to 10% for the stock. For two days straight, Paytm’s stock price dropped by 20%, causing a total loss of $2 billion for investors. This means the value of the company on the stock market decreased by a significant amount over those two days, leading to a big financial setback for shareholders.
What was the impact of this change?
The upper limit for Paytm is at Rs 535.75, while the upper limit is around Rs 438.35.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had barred Paytm Payments Bank, which is a unit of Paytm, from accepting fresh deposits in its accounts or popular wallets from March according to an ET report.
This actually heavily affected Paytm which is dependent on the bank for its operations. According to reports, RBI has identified thousands of accounts associated with Paytm without proper authentication. There have been quite a few claims on money laundering as well. This is definitely not a positive sign from the company.
What was the official statement?
Paytm CEO Vijay Shekhar Sharma took to social media to reassure users. In a concall, the company’s senior management said normalcy is expected by March.
The official statement stated that “Neither the Company nor its founder and CEO are being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate regarding inter alia money laundering. In the past, certain merchants/users on our platforms have been subject to inquiries and on those occasions, we have always cooperated with the authorities,” the company said.
“We would like to set the record straight and deny any involvement in anti-money laundering activities. We have and continue to abide by Indian laws and take regulatory orders with utmost seriousness,” Paytm added.
The company expects RBI’s action to have a worst case impact of Rs 300-500 crore on its annual EBITDA, going forward. However, it expects to continue on its trajectory to improve its profitability.
But did Paytm get through this…
To answer your question, No! Despite attempts to clarify Paytm’s situation, the company’s stock faced continued pressure on Dalal Street as investors persisted in selling shares amid concerns about the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) potential actions affecting Paytm’s operations.Reports from Bloomberg suggested that the RBI might revoke Paytm Payments Bank’s licence as early as next month.
Additionally, there were indications that the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) advised businesses to transition away from Paytm to alternative payment methods. Furthermore, several brokerage firms adjusted their target prices for Paytm downwards due to the regulatory uncertainties.
Jefferies downgraded Paytm to ‘Underperform’ status, setting a target price of Rs 500 per share, while Macquarie revised its target price to Rs 650 per share. Motilal Oswal expressed caution regarding Paytm’s business model and recommended a target price of Rs 575 per share. These developments underscored the challenging environment surrounding Paytm’s stock amid regulatory concerns and market sentiment, indicating a turbulent period ahead for the company.
What could be the possible reasons behind this step?
I mean obviously there are going to be various different reasons why or rather opinions. So let’s break these down!
Industry insiders proposed various potential explanations for the severe market response to Paytm’s stock decline. Some speculated concerns regarding data security, while others attributed it to possible excessive overlap between Paytm and Paytm Payments Bank. However, Paytm refuted any claims of data sharing between the two entities.
Additionally, industry experts emphasised the importance of interpreting the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) directives within the broader ecosystem context. They highlighted recent regulatory actions affecting not only Paytm but also the entire sector. Understanding the RBI’s orders necessitates considering their implications for the industry at large.
These actions could signal broader shifts in regulatory scrutiny or policy directions impacting fintech companies like Paytm. The focus extends beyond individual companies to encompass systemic factors shaping the regulatory landscape.
Thus, interpreting the reasons behind market movements requires a comprehensive understanding of regulatory dynamics, industry practices, and broader market sentiments. Such insights enable stakeholders to navigate challenges effectively and make informed decisions within the evolving regulatory environment, ensuring the sustainability and resilience of the fintech sector.
In conclusion, the challenges faced by Paytm reflect broader issues in the fintech sector, particularly regarding regulatory scrutiny and market sentiment. Despite efforts to reassure investors and address concerns, the company continues to face pressure amid uncertainties surrounding regulatory actions and market reactions.
Moving forward, it’s crucial for stakeholders to understand the multifaceted dynamics at play, including regulatory directives, industry practices, and market sentiments. By navigating these challenges with a comprehensive approach and making informed decisions, Paytm and similar fintech companies can strive to ensure their sustainability and resilience in an evolving regulatory environment, thereby safeguarding their future prospects.